P. Gnanam vs B. Arjunan, S/o. Beema Pillai, Advocate - Tr.B.S.Sankarapandian — 387/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040010822023

Filing Number

1001/2023

Filing Date

18-Oct-2023

Registration No

387/2023

Registration Date

20-Oct-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Gnanam

    Adv. Thiru. P. Pandiyan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B. Arjunan, S/o. Beema Pillai, Advocate - Tr.B.S.Sankarapandian

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: A.V.Ent. 387/2023 Court: Principal Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar Date: April 4, 2026 This is a civil dispute (likely a money recovery case) heard in the Cheyyar court. The court recorded the oral deposition/statement of the petitioner (age 69) regarding alleged financial transactions, including claims about a loan of ₹2,00,000 and subsequent payments with interest totaling ₹2,65,000. The judgment documents the witness's testimony denying certain allegations and providing his account of events related to debt repayment and property disputes with the opposing party. Outcome: The court completed the recording of the petitioner's statement in open court, which was read back and acknowledged as correct by the witness, as certified by the Principal Subordinate Judge N. Suresh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  12. 24-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  14. 12-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  17. 09-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 09-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  19. 26-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  22. 01-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  23. 07-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  24. 02-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  25. 21-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  26. 22-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  27. 25-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  28. 26-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  29. 24-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  30. 24-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  31. 20-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 18-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 387/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: A.V.Ent. 387/2023 Court: Principal Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar Date: April 4, 2026 This is a civil dispute (likely a money recovery case) heard in the Cheyyar court. The court recorded the oral deposition/statement of the petitioner (age 69) regarding alleged financial transactions, including claims about a loan of ₹2,00,000 and subsequent payments with interest totaling ₹2,65,000. The judgment documents the witness's testimony denying certain allegations and providing his account of events related to debt repayment and property disputes with the opposing party. Outcome: The court completed the recording of the petitioner's statement in open court, which was read back and acknowledged as correct by the witness, as certified by the Principal Subordinate Judge N. Suresh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case