P. Gnanam vs B. Arjunan, S/o. Beema Pillai, Advocate - Tr.B.S.Sankarapandian — 387/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040010822023

Judgement

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1001/2023

Filing Date

18-10-2023

Registration No

387/2023

Registration Date

20-10-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

P. Gnanam

Adv. Thiru. P. Pandiyan

Respondent(s)

B. Arjunan, S/o. Beema Pillai, Advocate - Tr.B.S.Sankarapandian

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

06-04-2026

Judgement

02-04-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

04-03-2026

Arguments

11-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

04-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: A.V.Ent. 387/2023 Court: Principal Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar Date: April 4, 2026 This is a civil dispute (likely a money recovery case) heard in the Cheyyar court. The court recorded the oral deposition/statement of the petitioner (age 69) regarding alleged financial transactions, including claims about a loan of ₹2,00,000 and subsequent payments with interest totaling ₹2,65,000. The judgment documents the witness's testimony denying certain allegations and providing his account of events related to debt repayment and property disputes with the opposing party. Outcome: The court completed the recording of the petitioner's statement in open court, which was read back and acknowledged as correct by the witness, as certified by the Principal Subordinate Judge N. Suresh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: A.V.Ent. 387/2023 Court: Principal Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar Date: April 4, 2026 This is a civil dispute (likely a money recovery case) heard in the Cheyyar court. The court recorded the oral deposition/statement of the petitioner (age 69) regarding alleged financial transactions, including claims about a loan of ₹2,00,000 and subsequent payments with interest totaling ₹2,65,000. The judgment documents the witness's testimony denying certain allegations and providing his account of events related to debt repayment and property disputes with the opposing party. Outcome: The court completed the recording of the petitioner's statement in open court, which was read back and acknowledged as correct by the witness, as certified by the Principal Subordinate Judge N. Suresh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case