P. Gnanam vs B. Arjunan, S/o. Beema Pillai, Advocate - Tr.B.S.Sankarapandian — 387/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040010822023
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1001/2023
Filing Date
18-10-2023
Registration No
387/2023
Registration Date
20-10-2023
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P. Gnanam
Adv. Thiru. P. Pandiyan
Respondent(s)
B. Arjunan, S/o. Beema Pillai, Advocate - Tr.B.S.Sankarapandian
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: A.V.Ent. 387/2023 Court: Principal Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar Date: April 4, 2026 This is a civil dispute (likely a money recovery case) heard in the Cheyyar court. The court recorded the oral deposition/statement of the petitioner (age 69) regarding alleged financial transactions, including claims about a loan of ₹2,00,000 and subsequent payments with interest totaling ₹2,65,000. The judgment documents the witness's testimony denying certain allegations and providing his account of events related to debt repayment and property disputes with the opposing party. Outcome: The court completed the recording of the petitioner's statement in open court, which was read back and acknowledged as correct by the witness, as certified by the Principal Subordinate Judge N. Suresh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: A.V.Ent. 387/2023 Court: Principal Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar Date: April 4, 2026 This is a civil dispute (likely a money recovery case) heard in the Cheyyar court. The court recorded the oral deposition/statement of the petitioner (age 69) regarding alleged financial transactions, including claims about a loan of ₹2,00,000 and subsequent payments with interest totaling ₹2,65,000. The judgment documents the witness's testimony denying certain allegations and providing his account of events related to debt repayment and property disputes with the opposing party. Outcome: The court completed the recording of the petitioner's statement in open court, which was read back and acknowledged as correct by the witness, as certified by the Principal Subordinate Judge N. Suresh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts