Jayaraj S/o Ethiraj vs Silambarasan S/o Venugopal Advocate - Tr.G.B., — 341/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040010392023

Filing Number

959/2023

Filing Date

10-Oct-2023

Registration No

341/2023

Registration Date

13-Oct-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayaraj S/o Ethiraj

    Adv. Thiru. G. Senguttuvan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Silambarasan S/o Venugopal Advocate - Tr.G.B.,

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case 341/2023 Summary: This is a civil dispute between Jayaraj (petitioner) and Silambarasan, an advocate (respondent), concerning a financial transaction. Jayaraj claims he lent money to Silambarasan but disputes the amount—asserting he gave ₹50,000 while Silambarasan claims ₹2,00,000 was borrowed. The petitioner contests Silambarasan's claims regarding the loan amount, the manner of repayment, and alleged harassment. The court examined the contradictory statements of both parties regarding the loan date (19.05.2021), repayment terms, and circumstances surrounding the transaction before rendering its decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 24-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  14. 08-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  15. 10-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  16. 09-Apr-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 09-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  18. 07-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  19. 07-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  20. 06-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  21. 15-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  22. 18-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  23. 15-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  24. 16-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  25. 13-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 10-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 341/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 341/2023 Summary: This is a civil dispute between Jayaraj (petitioner) and Silambarasan, an advocate (respondent), concerning a financial transaction. Jayaraj claims he lent money to Silambarasan but disputes the amount—asserting he gave ₹50,000 while Silambarasan claims ₹2,00,000 was borrowed. The petitioner contests Silambarasan's claims regarding the loan amount, the manner of repayment, and alleged harassment. The court examined the contradictory statements of both parties regarding the loan date (19.05.2021), repayment terms, and circumstances surrounding the transaction before rendering its decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case