Jayaraj S/o Ethiraj vs Silambarasan S/o Venugopal Advocate - Tr.G.B., — 341/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040010392023

Part Heard

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

959/2023

Filing Date

10-10-2023

Registration No

341/2023

Registration Date

13-10-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Jayaraj S/o Ethiraj

Adv. Thiru. G. Senguttuvan

Respondent(s)

Silambarasan S/o Venugopal Advocate - Tr.G.B.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

09-04-2026

Part Heard

13-03-2026

Part Heard

19-02-2026

Part Heard

10-02-2026

Part Heard

12-01-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

24-07-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case 341/2023 Summary: This is a civil dispute between Jayaraj (petitioner) and Silambarasan, an advocate (respondent), concerning a financial transaction. Jayaraj claims he lent money to Silambarasan but disputes the amount—asserting he gave ₹50,000 while Silambarasan claims ₹2,00,000 was borrowed. The petitioner contests Silambarasan's claims regarding the loan amount, the manner of repayment, and alleged harassment. The court examined the contradictory statements of both parties regarding the loan date (19.05.2021), repayment terms, and circumstances surrounding the transaction before rendering its decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 341/2023 Summary: This is a civil dispute between Jayaraj (petitioner) and Silambarasan, an advocate (respondent), concerning a financial transaction. Jayaraj claims he lent money to Silambarasan but disputes the amount—asserting he gave ₹50,000 while Silambarasan claims ₹2,00,000 was borrowed. The petitioner contests Silambarasan's claims regarding the loan amount, the manner of repayment, and alleged harassment. The court examined the contradictory statements of both parties regarding the loan date (19.05.2021), repayment terms, and circumstances surrounding the transaction before rendering its decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case