Jayaraj S/o Ethiraj vs Silambarasan S/o Venugopal Advocate - Tr.G.B., — 341/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040010392023
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
959/2023
Filing Date
10-10-2023
Registration No
341/2023
Registration Date
13-10-2023
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayaraj S/o Ethiraj
Adv. Thiru. G. Senguttuvan
Respondent(s)
Silambarasan S/o Venugopal Advocate - Tr.G.B.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 19-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 12-01-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case 341/2023 Summary: This is a civil dispute between Jayaraj (petitioner) and Silambarasan, an advocate (respondent), concerning a financial transaction. Jayaraj claims he lent money to Silambarasan but disputes the amount—asserting he gave ₹50,000 while Silambarasan claims ₹2,00,000 was borrowed. The petitioner contests Silambarasan's claims regarding the loan amount, the manner of repayment, and alleged harassment. The court examined the contradictory statements of both parties regarding the loan date (19.05.2021), repayment terms, and circumstances surrounding the transaction before rendering its decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 341/2023 Summary: This is a civil dispute between Jayaraj (petitioner) and Silambarasan, an advocate (respondent), concerning a financial transaction. Jayaraj claims he lent money to Silambarasan but disputes the amount—asserting he gave ₹50,000 while Silambarasan claims ₹2,00,000 was borrowed. The petitioner contests Silambarasan's claims regarding the loan amount, the manner of repayment, and alleged harassment. The court examined the contradictory statements of both parties regarding the loan date (19.05.2021), repayment terms, and circumstances surrounding the transaction before rendering its decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts