Danapakiyam vs Malliga, W/o. Devindiran — 330/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040009412023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
897/2023
Filing Date
14-09-2023
Registration No
330/2023
Registration Date
10-10-2023
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Danapakiyam
Adv. Thiru. P. Silambarasan
Kanniyappan, S/o. Murugesan
Ellammal
Respondent(s)
Malliga, W/o. Devindiran
Kavitha, D/o. Devendiran
Siva, S/o. Devendiran
Aravind, S/o. Devendiran
The Tahsildar
The Revenue Development Officer
The District Collector
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 21-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 16-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 02-04-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a civil case (O.S. No. 330/2023) involving a property dispute. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the defendant witness Malliga (wife of Devendiran) on 16-03-2026. Malliga testified regarding a property acquired in 1995 that has been registered in her name for over 31 years, and she denied the petitioners' claims of ownership or interest in the property. The document records her sworn testimony but does not contain a final judgment or order on the merits of the case; it appears to be a procedural record of witness examination during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil case (O.S. No. 330/2023) involving a property dispute. The court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the defendant witness Malliga (wife of Devendiran) on 16-03-2026. Malliga testified regarding a property acquired in 1995 that has been registered in her name for over 31 years, and she denied the petitioners' claims of ownership or interest in the property. The document records her sworn testimony but does not contain a final judgment or order on the merits of the case; it appears to be a procedural record of witness examination during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts