Samundeeswari vs Sivakumar Advocate - Tr.K.Sundaram — 321/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040008962022

Filing Number

874/2022

Filing Date

05-Dec-2022

Registration No

321/2022

Registration Date

07-Dec-2022

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Samundeeswari

    Adv. Thiru. M.S. Sankarapandiyan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sivakumar Advocate - Tr.K.Sundaram

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 321/2022 This is a civil suit heard on February 25, 2026, before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar. Petitioner Samundeeswari (45, housewife) testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Sivakumar. The court recorded her cross-examination statements confirming that the defendant and her husband had business dealings, the defendant purchased items, and her husband provided money approximately 4-5 years before filing the suit. She stated she has no independent income and is a homemaker. The defendant allegedly did not pay interest on the borrowed amount. The document records the witness examination findings and is signed by the judge, though no final order/judgment outcome is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  12. 05-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  13. 24-Jun-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  15. 24-Feb-2025

    Await Reports

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  16. 24-Oct-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  17. 25-Jul-2024

    Mediation

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  18. 25-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  19. 26-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  20. 03-Feb-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  21. 03-Jan-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  22. 20-Dec-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  23. 24-Nov-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  24. 17-Nov-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  25. 18-Aug-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  26. 13-Jun-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  27. 11-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  28. 10-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  29. 07-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 05-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 321/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 321/2022 This is a civil suit heard on February 25, 2026, before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar. Petitioner Samundeeswari (45, housewife) testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Sivakumar. The court recorded her cross-examination statements confirming that the defendant and her husband had business dealings, the defendant purchased items, and her husband provided money approximately 4-5 years before filing the suit. She stated she has no independent income and is a homemaker. The defendant allegedly did not pay interest on the borrowed amount. The document records the witness examination findings and is signed by the judge, though no final order/judgment outcome is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case