Samundeeswari vs Sivakumar Advocate - Tr.K.Sundaram — 321/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040008962022
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
874/2022
Filing Date
05-12-2022
Registration No
321/2022
Registration Date
07-12-2022
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Samundeeswari
Adv. Thiru. M.S. Sankarapandiyan
Respondent(s)
Sivakumar Advocate - Tr.K.Sundaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 321/2022 This is a civil suit heard on February 25, 2026, before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar. Petitioner Samundeeswari (45, housewife) testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Sivakumar. The court recorded her cross-examination statements confirming that the defendant and her husband had business dealings, the defendant purchased items, and her husband provided money approximately 4-5 years before filing the suit. She stated she has no independent income and is a homemaker. The defendant allegedly did not pay interest on the borrowed amount. The document records the witness examination findings and is signed by the judge, though no final order/judgment outcome is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 321/2022 This is a civil suit heard on February 25, 2026, before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar. Petitioner Samundeeswari (45, housewife) testified regarding a loan dispute with respondent Sivakumar. The court recorded her cross-examination statements confirming that the defendant and her husband had business dealings, the defendant purchased items, and her husband provided money approximately 4-5 years before filing the suit. She stated she has no independent income and is a homemaker. The defendant allegedly did not pay interest on the borrowed amount. The document records the witness examination findings and is signed by the judge, though no final order/judgment outcome is explicitly stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts