Jagadeeswaran vs Moorthy — 127/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTM040008632022

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

841/2022

Filing Date

21-11-2022

Registration No

127/2022

Registration Date

22-11-2022

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Jagadeeswaran

Adv. Thiru. S. Sudhakar

Respondent(s)

Moorthy

The United India Insurance Company Ltd.,

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

18-04-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Part Heard

24-02-2026

Enquiry

28-01-2026

Enquiry

16-12-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: M.C.O.P. No. 127/2022 Jagadeeswaran v. Moorthy and The United India Insurance Company Ltd. In this motor vehicle accident compensation case heard before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar on March 13, 2026, the petitioner's first witness testified regarding injuries sustained in a vehicle accident (TN 12 Z 2542). The witness submitted extensive medical and travel expense documents spanning from July 2022 to September 2024, including hospital discharge summaries, X-ray reports, and pharmacy receipts. The cross-examination was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.C.O.P. No. 127/2022 Jagadeeswaran v. Moorthy and The United India Insurance Company Ltd. In this motor vehicle accident compensation case heard before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar on March 13, 2026, the petitioner's first witness testified regarding injuries sustained in a vehicle accident (TN 12 Z 2542). The witness submitted extensive medical and travel expense documents spanning from July 2022 to September 2024, including hospital discharge summaries, X-ray reports, and pharmacy receipts. The cross-examination was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case