Jagadeeswaran vs Moorthy — 127/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTM040008632022
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
841/2022
Filing Date
21-11-2022
Registration No
127/2022
Registration Date
22-11-2022
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jagadeeswaran
Adv. Thiru. S. Sudhakar
Respondent(s)
Moorthy
The United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Evidence
Part Heard
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 24-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 28-01-2026 | Enquiry |
| 16-12-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M.C.O.P. No. 127/2022 Jagadeeswaran v. Moorthy and The United India Insurance Company Ltd. In this motor vehicle accident compensation case heard before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar on March 13, 2026, the petitioner's first witness testified regarding injuries sustained in a vehicle accident (TN 12 Z 2542). The witness submitted extensive medical and travel expense documents spanning from July 2022 to September 2024, including hospital discharge summaries, X-ray reports, and pharmacy receipts. The cross-examination was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.C.O.P. No. 127/2022 Jagadeeswaran v. Moorthy and The United India Insurance Company Ltd. In this motor vehicle accident compensation case heard before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar on March 13, 2026, the petitioner's first witness testified regarding injuries sustained in a vehicle accident (TN 12 Z 2542). The witness submitted extensive medical and travel expense documents spanning from July 2022 to September 2024, including hospital discharge summaries, X-ray reports, and pharmacy receipts. The cross-examination was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request, with the case remaining pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts