Veerasamy vs Natarajan Advocate - Tr.M.S.Sankarapandian — 310/2022

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040008382022

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

816/2022

Filing Date

15-11-2022

Registration No

310/2022

Registration Date

22-11-2022

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(d)
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Recall Petition Section VeerasamyNatarajan
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section VeerasamyNatarajan

Petitioner(s)

Veerasamy

Adv. Thiru. G. Ashok, Tr. K. Anandraj

Respondent(s)

Natarajan Advocate - Tr.M.S.Sankarapandian

Ganga

Sathish

Jayakumar

Sambath

The Tahshildar, Cheyyar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

01-06-2026

Evidence

30-04-2026

Evidence

10-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

23-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case 310/2022 Summary This is a property dispute (O.S. No. 310/2022) between Veerasamy (petitioner) and Natarajan Advocate and others (respondents) concerning ownership of land/property. On 13-03-2026, witness PW2 (Vedachalam) testified regarding property boundaries, location details, and competing ownership claims. The witness provided cross-examination testimony disputing various contentions about survey numbers, access routes, and prior panchayat decisions on the disputed property. The court recorded the witness's sworn testimony and examination details, with the case proceeding through its trial phase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 310/2022 Summary This is a property dispute (O.S. No. 310/2022) between Veerasamy (petitioner) and Natarajan Advocate and others (respondents) concerning ownership of land/property. On 13-03-2026, witness PW2 (Vedachalam) testified regarding property boundaries, location details, and competing ownership claims. The witness provided cross-examination testimony disputing various contentions about survey numbers, access routes, and prior panchayat decisions on the disputed property. The court recorded the witness's sworn testimony and examination details, with the case proceeding through its trial phase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case