Sankar vs Murugan Advocate - Tr.K.Damodaran, Tr.K.Sundaram, Tr.G.P., — 295/2022
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2), 25(d), 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040007372022
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
717/2022
Filing Date
10-10-2022
Registration No
295/2022
Registration Date
09-11-2022
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sankar
Adv. Thiru. S.R. Mannarasu
Respondent(s)
Murugan Advocate - Tr.K.Damodaran, Tr.K.Sundaram, Tr.G.P.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 17-02-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 27-01-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination proceeding in O.S. No. 295/2022 before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyar on March 10, 2026. The document records the examination-in-chief of Plaintiff's witness (Shankar, age 47, farmer from Erayur village) regarding property ownership, family details, and ancestral property rights dating back to 1932. The witness testimony concerning property documents, family members, and succession matters was recorded in open court, read over/interpreted to the witness, and acknowledged as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination proceeding in O.S. No. 295/2022 before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyar on March 10, 2026. The document records the examination-in-chief of Plaintiff's witness (Shankar, age 47, farmer from Erayur village) regarding property ownership, family details, and ancestral property rights dating back to 1932. The witness testimony concerning property documents, family members, and succession matters was recorded in open court, read over/interpreted to the witness, and acknowledged as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts