BALU vs BALASUBRAMANIYAN — 113/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULE IIA,ORDER 21 RULE 37,38. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNTM040006962025
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
e-Filing Number
17-11-2025
Filing Number
714/2025
Filing Date
21-11-2025
Registration No
113/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALU
Adv. ANANDRAJ K
Respondent(s)
BALASUBRAMANIYAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Orders
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 13-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 13-02-2026 | Orders |
| 09-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 28-11-2025 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 113/2025 In this civil case before the Principal Subordinate Court, Cheyyar, the first hearing was conducted on February 13, 2026. The petitioner's witness (Witness 1) testified and submitted affidavit evidence in support of the petition. The witness confirmed the accuracy of the affidavit statement, authenticated the signatures, and no documents were filed. The court recorded and acknowledged the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 113/2025 In this civil case before the Principal Subordinate Court, Cheyyar, the first hearing was conducted on February 13, 2026. The petitioner's witness (Witness 1) testified and submitted affidavit evidence in support of the petition. The witness confirmed the accuracy of the affidavit statement, authenticated the signatures, and no documents were filed. The court recorded and acknowledged the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts