Manikam S/o Kadigachalam mudaliyar vs Geethalakshmi W/o Late Ilangovan Advocate - Tr.E.P., — 221/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2), 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040006832023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
668/2023
Filing Date
07-07-2023
Registration No
221/2023
Registration Date
14-07-2023
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manikam S/o Kadigachalam mudaliyar
Adv. Tr. G. Senguttuvan
Pazhani S/o Kadigachalam
Respondent(s)
Geethalakshmi W/o Late Ilangovan Advocate - Tr.E.P.,
Jeyakumar S/o Devasundaram
Rajkumar @ Babu S/o Devasundaram
Rajalatchumi W/o Sivakumar
Chandhuru S/o Ravichandhiran
Santhiya S/o Ravichandhiran
Soumiya S/o Ravichandhiran
Barathkumar S/o T.K.Rajagopal chettiyar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 19-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. A.V. No. 221/2023 - This is a petition filed before the Primary Court in Bhavanpur. The court heard arguments from both parties on February 17, 2025, and the judge (J. R. Raghu, A.V., Primary Court, Bhavanpur) completed the hearing and reserved judgment on the petition and related matters. SKIP - The document appears to be a procedural order documenting the hearing date and submission of documents rather than a final order on the merits. No substantive outcome (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.) is stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. A.V. No. 221/2023 - This is a petition filed before the Primary Court in Bhavanpur. The court heard arguments from both parties on February 17, 2025, and the judge (J. R. Raghu, A.V., Primary Court, Bhavanpur) completed the hearing and reserved judgment on the petition and related matters. SKIP - The document appears to be a procedural order documenting the hearing date and submission of documents rather than a final order on the merits. No substantive outcome (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.) is stated in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts