Dhanammal vs Indira — 208/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(1),25(d),27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040006752024

Arguments

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

1123/2024

Filing Date

08-11-2024

Registration No

208/2024

Registration Date

25-11-2024

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(1),25(d),27(c)
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Recall Petition Section DhanammalIndira
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section Dhanammal
Ia/4/2026 Classification : 151 Petition Section IndiraDhanammal
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Petition to Receive Document Section Dhanammal

Petitioner(s)

Dhanammal

Adv. Tr.P.V.Ravichandran, B.Sc., LLB.,

Santhoshkumar

Respondent(s)

Indira

Dineshkumar

Subash

Sangeetha

Saranya

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

01-06-2026

Arguments

22-04-2026

Part Heard

17-04-2026

Part Heard

07-04-2026

Part Heard

25-03-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

25-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: O.S. No. 208/2024 On 25-03-2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness DW3 (Baskaran). The witness testified regarding property matters involving a deceased person named Sanmugam, including claims about property ownership, house construction, and financial transactions. The court found the witness's testimony credible and supporting the defendants' position. No cross-examination by plaintiffs' counsel was recorded. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 208/2024 On 25-03-2026, the court recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness DW3 (Baskaran). The witness testified regarding property matters involving a deceased person named Sanmugam, including claims about property ownership, house construction, and financial transactions. The court found the witness's testimony credible and supporting the defendants' position. No cross-examination by plaintiffs' counsel was recorded. The case remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case