Ellammal and others vs Kanniyammal and others Advocate - Selvi. T.G.Selvi — 277/2020

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d), 25(d), 27(c). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040005992020

Arguments

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

590/2020

Filing Date

13-10-2020

Registration No

277/2020

Registration Date

16-10-2020

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d), 25(d), 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Ellammal and others

Adv. Tr. T.Kandhasamy

Ponnusamy

Settharaman

Jayaraman

Perumal

Respondent(s)

Kanniyammal and others Advocate - Selvi. T.G.Selvi

Kasinathan

Banumathi

Suresh

Prabhavathi

Sub Registrar-1, Sub Registrar-1 Office , Cheyyar

Tahsildar, Cheyyar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

08-04-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Arguments

10-02-2026

Arguments

04-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

24-11-2025
Copy of Deposition

This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 277/2020) before the Principal Subordinate Judge in Chengalpattu district concerning a property dispute over 40 cents of land (Survey No. 76). The court has recorded the examination-in-chief testimony of the defendant's witness (Suresh, age 30) regarding ownership and possession of the disputed property, with the witness asserting the plaintiffs' claims to the land are unfounded. The case appears to be ongoing with further proceedings pending, as this document represents only the witness deposition recorded on November 24, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 277/2020) before the Principal Subordinate Judge in Chengalpattu district concerning a property dispute over 40 cents of land (Survey No. 76). The court has recorded the examination-in-chief testimony of the defendant's witness (Suresh, age 30) regarding ownership and possession of the disputed property, with the witness asserting the plaintiffs' claims to the land are unfounded. The case appears to be ongoing with further proceedings pending, as this document represents only the witness deposition recorded on November 24, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case