D. Durairaja vs K.S. Deepa — 187/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040005802024
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
1029/2024
Filing Date
11-03-2024
Registration No
187/2024
Registration Date
18-10-2024
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D. Durairaja
Adv. Thiru. G. Ashok
Respondent(s)
K.S. Deepa
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 19-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 06-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 06-12-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case 187/2024 Summary This case involves a petition by D. Durairaja (petitioner, age 62) against K.S. Deepa (respondent) heard on September 9, 2025. The petitioner filed a petition under relevant procedural rules, submitting documents including government orders (dated 16/07/2001) related to land acquisition and revenue department procedures. The court heard arguments from both parties and proceeded to dispose of the matter according to law. Note: The document is partially garbled in the Tamil text sections, making it difficult to determine the precise nature of the relief sought and the exact outcome ordered. A clearer version would be needed for a definitive conclusion on whether the petition was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 187/2024 Summary This case involves a petition by D. Durairaja (petitioner, age 62) against K.S. Deepa (respondent) heard on September 9, 2025. The petitioner filed a petition under relevant procedural rules, submitting documents including government orders (dated 16/07/2001) related to land acquisition and revenue department procedures. The court heard arguments from both parties and proceeded to dispose of the matter according to law. Note: The document is partially garbled in the Tamil text sections, making it difficult to determine the precise nature of the relief sought and the exact outcome ordered. A clearer version would be needed for a definitive conclusion on whether the petition was allowed, dismissed, or adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts