Kanniyammal and 5 others vs Chinnapayan and 3 others — 100040/2018

Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section c,d. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNTM040005752018

Arguments

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100040/2018

Filing Date

24-07-2018

Registration No

100040/2018

Registration Date

24-07-2018

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

ARMS ACT, 1959 Section c,d
IA/2/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Kanniyammal and 5 othersMuchandi
IA/3/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Chinnapayan and 3 others

Petitioner(s)

Kanniyammal and 5 others

Adv. G.Selvi

Thulukanam

Adv. G.Selvi

Kalyani

Adv. G.Selvi

Selsa

Adv. G.selvi

Elumalai

Adv. G.Selvi

Santhi

Adv. G.Selvi

Respondent(s)

Chinnapayan and 3 others

Muchandi

Adv. Tr.G.Ashok M.A. B.L.

Sub Registrar

District Registrar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

22-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Judgement

Interim Orders

28-10-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary: In Appeal case A.S.No. 40/2018 dated 28-10-2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding a loan agreement dispute. The court found credibility issues with the witness's evidence and discrepancies in the documents presented, including regarding 23 exhibits that were claimed to be relevant but lacked proper connection to the appeal. The court ordered dismissal of the appeal, finding that the appellant failed to establish valid grounds and proceeded with irrelevant documentation to obstruct the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Appeal case A.S.No. 40/2018 dated 28-10-2025, the court examined witness testimony regarding a loan agreement dispute. The court found credibility issues with the witness's evidence and discrepancies in the documents presented, including regarding 23 exhibits that were claimed to be relevant but lacked proper connection to the appeal. The court ordered dismissal of the appeal, finding that the appellant failed to establish valid grounds and proceeded with irrelevant documentation to obstruct the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case