Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir) vs Narasimman S/o Ellappan Advocate - A.Kalingan — 236/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040005692023

Case disposed

Filing Number

562/2023

Filing Date

27-07-2023

Registration No

236/2023

Registration Date

31-07-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d)
Ia/1/2025 Classification : 5 of Limitation Act Section Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir)Narasimman S/o Ellappan
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Abatement Petition Section Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir)Narasimman S/o Ellappan
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Lr Petition Section Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir)Narasimman S/o Ellappan
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Petition to Appoint Guardian Section Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir)Narasimman S/o Ellappan
Ia/5/2026 Classification : Restoration Petition Section Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir)Narasimman S/o Ellappan

Petitioner(s)

Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir)

Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

Chinnaponnu W/o. Subramani (late)

Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

Kuppan S/o. Subramani (late)

Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

D. Saraswathi D/o. Daas (late)Represented by Guardian - Kuppan S/o. Subramani (late)

Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

D. Dhinashi D/o. Daas (late)

Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,

Respondent(s)

Narasimman S/o Ellappan Advocate - A.Kalingan

Krishnasamy S/o Ellappan

Adv. A.Kalingan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

02-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Amendment

03-03-2026

Amendment

11-02-2026

Amendment

03-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

12-03-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary: OS No. 236/2023 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's claims and granted decree in favor of the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his case regarding the disputed 60 cents of land and the alleged incomplete consideration paid to the defendants' father. The court held that the defendants have rightful ownership and possession of the disputed property. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the plaintiff's testimony was inconsistent and unconvincing. While the plaintiff claimed he only paid 30 cents' consideration (not 60 cents as documented), he could not adequately explain the registered sale deed showing 60 cents transfer or justify his subsequent actions in attempting to recover the property. The court noted contradictions in the plaintiff's statements regarding the original partition, the deed's execution, and his prior conduct of filing complaints and later withdrawing them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 236/2023 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's claims and granted decree in favor of the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his case regarding the disputed 60 cents of land and the alleged incomplete consideration paid to the defendants' father. The court held that the defendants have rightful ownership and possession of the disputed property. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the plaintiff's testimony was inconsistent and unconvincing. While the plaintiff claimed he only paid 30 cents' consideration (not 60 cents as documented), he could not adequately explain the registered sale deed showing 60 cents transfer or justify his subsequent actions in attempting to recover the property. The court noted contradictions in the plaintiff's statements regarding the original partition, the deed's execution, and his prior conduct of filing complaints and later withdrawing them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case