Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir) vs Narasimman S/o Ellappan Advocate - A.Kalingan — 236/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040005692023

Filing Number

562/2023

Filing Date

27-Jul-2023

Registration No

236/2023

Registration Date

31-Jul-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subramani (Died) S/o Chellakutty(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

  2. 2.Chinnaponnu W/o. Subramani (late)

    Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

  3. 3.Kuppan S/o. Subramani (late)

    Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

  4. 4.D. Saraswathi D/o. Daas (late)Represented by Guardian - Kuppan S/o. Subramani (late)

    Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,1.

  5. 5.D. Dhinashi D/o. Daas (late)

    Adv. Mr.A.V.Manigandan, B.Sc., L.L.B.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narasimman S/o Ellappan Advocate - A.Kalingan

  2. 2.Krishnasamy S/o Ellappan

    Adv. A.Kalingan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  15. 01-Jul-2025

    Steps

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  16. 19-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  17. 12-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  18. 05-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  19. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  20. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  21. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  22. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  23. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  24. 12-Mar-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 236/2023 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's claims and granted decree in favor of the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his case regarding the disputed 60 cents of land and the alleged incomplete consideration paid to the defendants' father. The court held that the defendants have rightful ownership and possession of the disputed property. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the plaintiff's testimony was inconsistent and unconvincing. While the plaintiff claimed he only paid 30 cents' consideration (not 60 cents as documented), he could not adequately explain the registered sale deed showing 60 cents transfer or justify his subsequent actions in attempting to recover the property. The court noted contradictions in the plaintiff's statements regarding the original partition, the deed's execution, and his prior conduct of filing complaints and later withdrawing them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  25. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  26. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  27. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  28. 18-Feb-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  29. 18-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  30. 05-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  31. 18-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  32. 19-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  33. 27-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  34. 02-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  35. 27-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  36. 31-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  37. 31-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 27-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 236/2023 Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's claims and granted decree in favor of the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish his case regarding the disputed 60 cents of land and the alleged incomplete consideration paid to the defendants' father. The court held that the defendants have rightful ownership and possession of the disputed property. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the plaintiff's testimony was inconsistent and unconvincing. While the plaintiff claimed he only paid 30 cents' consideration (not 60 cents as documented), he could not adequately explain the registered sale deed showing 60 cents transfer or justify his subsequent actions in attempting to recover the property. The court noted contradictions in the plaintiff's statements regarding the original partition, the deed's execution, and his prior conduct of filing complaints and later withdrawing them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case