Minnala W/o. Selvaraj vs Poovan S/o. Anandan — 32/2025

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2),27(c). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040005572024

Filing Number

1007/2024

Filing Date

04-Oct-2024

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

12-Feb-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2),27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Minnala W/o. Selvaraj

    Adv. Thiru. M. Rajesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Poovan S/o. Anandan

  2. 2.Chinna Pappammal W/o. Anandan

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    SUMMARY OF CASE 32/2025 This is a property inheritance dispute where petitioner Minnala (wife of Selvaraj) claims inheritance rights to ancestral properties against respondents Poovan and Chinna Pappammal. Minnala argues that certain properties belong to her father Anandan's estate and should pass to her as a heir. She contends that respondents wrongfully possess and control these properties. The court recorded Minnala's sworn testimony detailing family genealogy, property ownership history, and her claim that properties in Sitthambakkam and other villages should constitute her inheritance share. The case involves disputed ancestral property succession with no final judgment recorded in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  16. 29-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  19. 19-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  20. 19-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  21. 28-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  23. 30-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  24. 11-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  25. 17-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  26. 12-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  27. 12-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 04-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY OF CASE 32/2025 This is a property inheritance dispute where petitioner Minnala (wife of Selvaraj) claims inheritance rights to ancestral properties against respondents Poovan and Chinna Pappammal. Minnala argues that certain properties belong to her father Anandan's estate and should pass to her as a heir. She contends that respondents wrongfully possess and control these properties. The court recorded Minnala's sworn testimony detailing family genealogy, property ownership history, and her claim that properties in Sitthambakkam and other villages should constitute her inheritance share. The case involves disputed ancestral property succession with no final judgment recorded in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case