Minnala W/o. Selvaraj vs Poovan S/o. Anandan — 32/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2),27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040005572024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
1007/2024
Filing Date
04-10-2024
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
12-02-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minnala W/o. Selvaraj
Adv. Thiru. M. Rajesh
Respondent(s)
Poovan S/o. Anandan
Chinna Pappammal W/o. Anandan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 13-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 03-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY OF CASE 32/2025 This is a property inheritance dispute where petitioner Minnala (wife of Selvaraj) claims inheritance rights to ancestral properties against respondents Poovan and Chinna Pappammal. Minnala argues that certain properties belong to her father Anandan's estate and should pass to her as a heir. She contends that respondents wrongfully possess and control these properties. The court recorded Minnala's sworn testimony detailing family genealogy, property ownership history, and her claim that properties in Sitthambakkam and other villages should constitute her inheritance share. The case involves disputed ancestral property succession with no final judgment recorded in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY OF CASE 32/2025 This is a property inheritance dispute where petitioner Minnala (wife of Selvaraj) claims inheritance rights to ancestral properties against respondents Poovan and Chinna Pappammal. Minnala argues that certain properties belong to her father Anandan's estate and should pass to her as a heir. She contends that respondents wrongfully possess and control these properties. The court recorded Minnala's sworn testimony detailing family genealogy, property ownership history, and her claim that properties in Sitthambakkam and other villages should constitute her inheritance share. The case involves disputed ancestral property succession with no final judgment recorded in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts