R. Isaivanan vs P. Venkatesan, S/o. Parasuraman — 143/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(a),25(d). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040004102024
Filing Number
403/2024
Filing Date
30-07-2024
Registration No
143/2024
Registration Date
02-08-2024
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R. Isaivanan
Adv. Thiru. J. Ramakrishnan
Respondent(s)
P. Venkatesan, S/o. Parasuraman
A. Parasuraman, S/o. Ammavasai Gounder, No.447, Mettu Street,
Duraisami Gounder, S/o. Narayanasami Gounder
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S.No.143/2024 - Isaivanan v. P. Venkatesan & Others The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and possession, holding that he established absolute ownership of the disputed 0.32-cent property through a valid chain of title via gift settlement and sale deeds from 1976-1999. The court declared three sale deeds (1983, 1996, 2019) null and void insofar as they affected the plaintiff's property, finding the original vendor lacked authority to convey the northern portion. The defendants were ordered to vacate the encroached property within two months and permanently restrained from interference with the plaintiff's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No.143/2024 - Isaivanan v. P. Venkatesan & Others The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for declaration and possession, holding that he established absolute ownership of the disputed 0.32-cent property through a valid chain of title via gift settlement and sale deeds from 1976-1999. The court declared three sale deeds (1983, 1996, 2019) null and void insofar as they affected the plaintiff's property, finding the original vendor lacked authority to convey the northern portion. The defendants were ordered to vacate the encroached property within two months and permanently restrained from interference with the plaintiff's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts