Rajeeswari vs Manjula, W/o. Pandurangan Advocate - Thiru. K.Ragotham for R4, Tr. K.Sundaram for R6, R — 15/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.

AS - Appeal Suit

CNR: TNTM040004052023

Case disposed

Filing Number

399/2023

Filing Date

19-04-2023

Registration No

15/2024

Registration Date

12-02-2024

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41

Petitioner(s)

Rajeeswari

Adv. Thiru. S.R. Mannarasu

Respondent(s)

Manjula, W/o. Pandurangan Advocate - Thiru. K.Ragotham for R4, Tr. K.Sundaram for R6, R

Suganya, W/o. Senthilkumar

Gayathri, W/o. Mani

The Manager, Indian Bank

The Tahsildar

Sathiya, W/o. Saravanan

Chithra, W/o. Sivakumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

05-03-2026

Disposed

04-03-2026

Judgement

03-03-2026

Judgement

10-02-2026

Judgement

09-02-2026

Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

05-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's decision, holding that children born to the deceased through a relationship during his first marriage are entitled to equal inheritance rights as Class I heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court rejected the appellants' claim to exclusive ownership of pledged gold jewelry, finding insufficient evidence and determining the jewelry belonged to the deceased, whose estate must be shared among all legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's decision, holding that children born to the deceased through a relationship during his first marriage are entitled to equal inheritance rights as Class I heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court rejected the appellants' claim to exclusive ownership of pledged gold jewelry, finding insufficient evidence and determining the jewelry belonged to the deceased, whose estate must be shared among all legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case