Rajeeswari vs Manjula, W/o. Pandurangan Advocate - Thiru. K.Ragotham for R4, Tr. K.Sundaram for R6, R — 15/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th March 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNTM040004052023
Filing Number
399/2023
Filing Date
19-04-2023
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
12-02-2024
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajeeswari
Adv. Thiru. S.R. Mannarasu
Respondent(s)
Manjula, W/o. Pandurangan Advocate - Thiru. K.Ragotham for R4, Tr. K.Sundaram for R6, R
Suganya, W/o. Senthilkumar
Gayathri, W/o. Mani
The Manager, Indian Bank
The Tahsildar
Sathiya, W/o. Saravanan
Chithra, W/o. Sivakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's decision, holding that children born to the deceased through a relationship during his first marriage are entitled to equal inheritance rights as Class I heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court rejected the appellants' claim to exclusive ownership of pledged gold jewelry, finding insufficient evidence and determining the jewelry belonged to the deceased, whose estate must be shared among all legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the trial court's decision, holding that children born to the deceased through a relationship during his first marriage are entitled to equal inheritance rights as Class I heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court rejected the appellants' claim to exclusive ownership of pledged gold jewelry, finding insufficient evidence and determining the jewelry belonged to the deceased, whose estate must be shared among all legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts