P.N. Gangadharan S/o. Nadarajan vs A. Dhanasekaran S/o. Arunachala Mudaliar — 136/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 05th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040003842025
Filing Number
394/2025
Filing Date
09-07-2025
Registration No
136/2025
Registration Date
11-07-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Decision Date
05th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.N. Gangadharan S/o. Nadarajan
Adv. THIRU.T.KANDASWAMY
Respondent(s)
A. Dhanasekaran S/o. Arunachala Mudaliar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Disposed
Judgement
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In this affidavit case (O.S. No. 136/2025) before the Additional Subordinate Court, Cheyayarau, heard on February 25, 2026, the plaintiff (Gangarathran) testified regarding a promissory note dated January 10, 2024, for Rs. 7,00,000 issued by the defendant. The court recorded the plaintiff's sworn testimony confirming the authenticity of the affidavit and the promissory note, along with supporting documents including an Aadhar card copy, with no cross-examination as the defendant did not contest the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this affidavit case (O.S. No. 136/2025) before the Additional Subordinate Court, Cheyayarau, heard on February 25, 2026, the plaintiff (Gangarathran) testified regarding a promissory note dated January 10, 2024, for Rs. 7,00,000 issued by the defendant. The court recorded the plaintiff's sworn testimony confirming the authenticity of the affidavit and the promissory note, along with supporting documents including an Aadhar card copy, with no cross-examination as the defendant did not contest the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts