Jothimani vs Kumarasamy — 163/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040003792020

Filing Number

373/2020

Filing Date

31-Jul-2020

Registration No

163/2020

Registration Date

13-Aug-2020

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jothimani

    Adv. M.S.Sankarapandiyan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kumarasamy

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary This is a civil case (A.S. No. 163/2020) heard before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar on March 4, 2026. The court recorded the detailed testimony of the petitioner (Jothimani) regarding a monetary dispute with the respondent (Duraiswami), wherein the petitioner claimed money was lent in 2017 and various assertions were made regarding repayment and subsequent disputes. The court documented the witness statement in full and acknowledged it as correct in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  12. 18-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 18-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  14. 08-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  16. 25-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  17. 25-Mar-2025

    Restored

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  18. 25-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  19. 10-Oct-2022

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  20. 10-Oct-2022

    Disposed

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  21. 14-Sep-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  22. 04-Aug-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  23. 17-Jun-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  24. 16-Mar-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  25. 21-Dec-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  26. 23-Oct-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  27. 19-Aug-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  28. 30-Jun-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  29. 22-Apr-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  30. 24-Mar-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  31. 24-Feb-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  32. 11-Jan-2021

    Issue of Service

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  33. 09-Nov-2020

    Batta

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  34. 14-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 31-Jul-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (A.S. No. 163/2020) heard before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar on March 4, 2026. The court recorded the detailed testimony of the petitioner (Jothimani) regarding a monetary dispute with the respondent (Duraiswami), wherein the petitioner claimed money was lent in 2017 and various assertions were made regarding repayment and subsequent disputes. The court documented the witness statement in full and acknowledged it as correct in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case