K. Arumugam vs M. Sampath S/o. Munusamy Pillai Advocate - Thiru. G. Senguttuvan — 118/2025

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040003622025

Evidence

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

371/2025

Filing Date

01-07-2025

Registration No

118/2025

Registration Date

02-07-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

K. Arumugam

Adv. Mr. P.Pandiyan M.A. B.L.

Respondent(s)

M. Sampath S/o. Munusamy Pillai Advocate - Thiru. G. Senguttuvan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

09-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Evidence

24-02-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Trial

16-02-2026

Trial

Interim Orders

24-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary O.S. No. 118/2025 - Civil suit concerning a monetary loan dispute. The plaintiff testified that he lent ₹8 lakhs to the defendant in multiple installments (₹3.5 lakhs, ₹1.5 lakhs, and ₹3 lakhs), with a panchayat document acknowledging the debt. The defendant's cross-examination revealed disputes over the actual loan amount, interest rate, and repayment details. The court found the defendant's testimony and explanations regarding the loan transaction and acknowledgment document to be unreliable and evasive. The case proceeded on the recorded evidence with the cross-examination of PW1 (plaintiff) completed on 24-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary O.S. No. 118/2025 - Civil suit concerning a monetary loan dispute. The plaintiff testified that he lent ₹8 lakhs to the defendant in multiple installments (₹3.5 lakhs, ₹1.5 lakhs, and ₹3 lakhs), with a panchayat document acknowledging the debt. The defendant's cross-examination revealed disputes over the actual loan amount, interest rate, and repayment details. The court found the defendant's testimony and explanations regarding the loan transaction and acknowledgment document to be unreliable and evasive. The case proceeded on the recorded evidence with the cross-examination of PW1 (plaintiff) completed on 24-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case