K. Arumugam vs M. Sampath S/o. Munusamy Pillai Advocate - Thiru. G. Senguttuvan — 118/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040003622025
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
371/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
118/2025
Registration Date
02-07-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Arumugam
Adv. Mr. P.Pandiyan M.A. B.L.
Respondent(s)
M. Sampath S/o. Munusamy Pillai Advocate - Thiru. G. Senguttuvan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Trial |
| 16-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary O.S. No. 118/2025 - Civil suit concerning a monetary loan dispute. The plaintiff testified that he lent ₹8 lakhs to the defendant in multiple installments (₹3.5 lakhs, ₹1.5 lakhs, and ₹3 lakhs), with a panchayat document acknowledging the debt. The defendant's cross-examination revealed disputes over the actual loan amount, interest rate, and repayment details. The court found the defendant's testimony and explanations regarding the loan transaction and acknowledgment document to be unreliable and evasive. The case proceeded on the recorded evidence with the cross-examination of PW1 (plaintiff) completed on 24-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary O.S. No. 118/2025 - Civil suit concerning a monetary loan dispute. The plaintiff testified that he lent ₹8 lakhs to the defendant in multiple installments (₹3.5 lakhs, ₹1.5 lakhs, and ₹3 lakhs), with a panchayat document acknowledging the debt. The defendant's cross-examination revealed disputes over the actual loan amount, interest rate, and repayment details. The court found the defendant's testimony and explanations regarding the loan transaction and acknowledgment document to be unreliable and evasive. The case proceeded on the recorded evidence with the cross-examination of PW1 (plaintiff) completed on 24-02-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts