Harigovindhan S/o. Perumal vs Singaram S/o. Perumal — 100/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 10th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040002962025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
304/2025
Filing Date
06-06-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
13-06-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Harigovindhan S/o. Perumal
Adv. Tr.G.Ashok M.A. B.L.
Respondent(s)
Singaram S/o. Perumal
Sudha W/o. Singaram
Murugan S/o. Singaram
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that the plaintiff has full title, right, and interest in the property and granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment of the land. The court found that the plaintiff lawfully acquired the property through a registered deed dated 10.12.2007 and has been in continuous possession, while the defendants failed to appear or contest the claims, resulting in an ex-parte judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that the plaintiff has full title, right, and interest in the property and granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment of the land. The court found that the plaintiff lawfully acquired the property through a registered deed dated 10.12.2007 and has been in continuous possession, while the defendants failed to appear or contest the claims, resulting in an ex-parte judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts