Harigovindhan S/o. Perumal vs Singaram S/o. Perumal — 100/2025

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 10th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040002962025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

304/2025

Filing Date

06-06-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

13-06-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

Harigovindhan S/o. Perumal

Adv. Tr.G.Ashok M.A. B.L.

Respondent(s)

Singaram S/o. Perumal

Sudha W/o. Singaram

Murugan S/o. Singaram

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

10-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Judgement

26-02-2026

Arguments

10-02-2026

Arguments

06-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that the plaintiff has full title, right, and interest in the property and granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment of the land. The court found that the plaintiff lawfully acquired the property through a registered deed dated 10.12.2007 and has been in continuous possession, while the defendants failed to appear or contest the claims, resulting in an ex-parte judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that the plaintiff has full title, right, and interest in the property and granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment of the land. The court found that the plaintiff lawfully acquired the property through a registered deed dated 10.12.2007 and has been in continuous possession, while the defendants failed to appear or contest the claims, resulting in an ex-parte judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case