Harigovindhan S/o. Perumal vs Singaram S/o. Perumal — 100/2025

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040002962025

Filing Number

304/2025

Filing Date

06-Jun-2025

Registration No

100/2025

Registration Date

13-Jun-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harigovindhan S/o. Perumal

    Adv. Tr.G.Ashok M.A. B.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Singaram S/o. Perumal

  2. 2.Sudha W/o. Singaram

  3. 3.Murugan S/o. Singaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that the plaintiff has full title, right, and interest in the property and granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment of the land. The court found that the plaintiff lawfully acquired the property through a registered deed dated 10.12.2007 and has been in continuous possession, while the defendants failed to appear or contest the claims, resulting in an ex-parte judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  16. 17-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  18. 13-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 06-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that the plaintiff has full title, right, and interest in the property and granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment of the land. The court found that the plaintiff lawfully acquired the property through a registered deed dated 10.12.2007 and has been in continuous possession, while the defendants failed to appear or contest the claims, resulting in an ex-parte judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case