J. Sanjeev Jayaprakash vs V.T. Muniyan, S/o. Thanigachalam — 56/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040002292025
Filing Number
237/2025
Filing Date
27-Mar-2025
Registration No
56/2025
Registration Date
01-Apr-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J. Sanjeev Jayaprakash
Adv. THIRU. V. NARAYANAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.V.T. Muniyan, S/o. Thanigachalam
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
22-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
08-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: The court dismissed the petitioner's interim application (I.A. No. 1/2025) in O.S. No. 56/2025 dated 25.03.2026. The petitioner sought to have a promissory note dated 06.08.2022 for ₹2,50,000 examined by a handwriting expert, claiming it was forged. The court found the petition lacked merit, noting the respondent had not contradicted the authenticity of the signature and the petitioner failed to provide contemporary supporting documents, making the petition dismissible without examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
24-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
10-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
07-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
23-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
06-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
27-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
06-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
19-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
02-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
19-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
06-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
13-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
09-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
07-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
15-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
12-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
04-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
02-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
21-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
21-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
13-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
05-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
25-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Trial
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
15-Jul-2025
Trial
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
19-Jun-2025
Trial
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
02-Jun-2025
Issues
Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
-
01-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2025
Summary: The court dismissed the petitioner's interim application (I.A. No. 1/2025) in O.S. No. 56/2025 dated 25.03.2026. The petitioner sought to have a promissory note dated 06.08.2022 for ₹2,50,000 examined by a handwriting expert, claiming it was forged. The court found the petition lacked merit, noting the respondent had not contradicted the authenticity of the signature and the petitioner failed to provide contemporary supporting documents, making the petition dismissible without examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts