K.Yahubhasha vs R. Baskar and others Advocate - Tr.T.P.Saravanan, M.Com, B.L., — 40/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTM040002192021
Filing Number
212/2021
Filing Date
04-Mar-2021
Registration No
40/2021
Registration Date
19-Apr-2021
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.Yahubhasha
Adv. Tr.V. Tamilarasu
Respondent(s)
-
1.R. Baskar and others Advocate - Tr.T.P.Saravanan, M.Com, B.L.,
-
2.Jayakumar
-
3.The Manager, The New INdia Assurance Co Ltd,
Adv. Mr. S. Karthikeyan B.Sc.B.L.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
26-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
26-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
28-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 40/2021 - K. Yahubhasha v. R. Baskar and Others The court rejected the petitioner's claim for compensation regarding an insurance policy (Policy No. 25, Rs. 9000) dated 01/02/2019, finding that the petitioner failed to establish liability. The court determined that the petitioner obtained the policy with the second respondent's permission and could not claim damages for injuries sustained after obtaining it, as the damage occurred due to the petitioner's own actions rather than the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
19-Oct-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
20-Sep-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
27-Feb-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
27-Feb-2024
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
28-Nov-2023
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
29-Aug-2023
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
01-Jul-2023
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
23-Mar-2023
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
23-Dec-2022
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
27-Oct-2022
Enquiry
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
21-Sep-2022
Counter
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
21-Jun-2022
Counter
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
09-Mar-2022
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
12-Jan-2022
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
10-Nov-2021
Issue of Service
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
03-Sep-2021
Batta
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
30-Jul-2021
Batta
Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
-
09-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2021
Case Summary: 40/2021 - K. Yahubhasha v. R. Baskar and Others The court rejected the petitioner's claim for compensation regarding an insurance policy (Policy No. 25, Rs. 9000) dated 01/02/2019, finding that the petitioner failed to establish liability. The court determined that the petitioner obtained the policy with the second respondent's permission and could not claim damages for injuries sustained after obtaining it, as the damage occurred due to the petitioner's own actions rather than the respondent's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts