C. Murugan S/o. Chinnasamy vs C. Chithra W/o. Elango Advocate - Mr. K. Sundaram B.A. B.L. — 96/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040002162024

Filing Number

213/2024

Filing Date

25-Apr-2024

Registration No

96/2024

Registration Date

30-Apr-2024

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C. Murugan S/o. Chinnasamy

    Adv. Mr. S.R. Mannarasu M.A. M.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C. Chithra W/o. Elango Advocate - Mr. K. Sundaram B.A. B.L.

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Restored

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 96/2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered respondent C. Chithra to pay petitioner C. Murugan ₹6,85,250 plus 12% interest from filing date until judgment date, and 6% interest thereafter until payment. Additionally, ₹5,00,000 principal amount carries 18% interest from the loan date onwards. Core Dispute: Murugan alleged Chithra borrowed ₹5,00,000 on 1 March 2022 against a promissory note and failed to repay despite demands. Chithra denied receiving a formal loan, claiming expenses were for house construction work she commissioned. The court found credible evidence supporting Murugan's claim through witness testimony and documentary evidence, while Chithra failed to appear or contest substantively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Disposed

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  14. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  15. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  16. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  17. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  18. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  19. 26-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  20. 07-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  21. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  22. 09-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  23. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  24. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  25. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  26. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  27. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  28. 21-Mar-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  29. 21-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  30. 05-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  31. 25-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  32. 10-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  33. 21-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  34. 14-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  35. 15-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  36. 12-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar

  37. 30-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 25-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 96/2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court ordered respondent C. Chithra to pay petitioner C. Murugan ₹6,85,250 plus 12% interest from filing date until judgment date, and 6% interest thereafter until payment. Additionally, ₹5,00,000 principal amount carries 18% interest from the loan date onwards. Core Dispute: Murugan alleged Chithra borrowed ₹5,00,000 on 1 March 2022 against a promissory note and failed to repay despite demands. Chithra denied receiving a formal loan, claiming expenses were for house construction work she commissioned. The court found credible evidence supporting Murugan's claim through witness testimony and documentary evidence, while Chithra failed to appear or contest substantively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case