V. Anbalangan vs Mahalakshmi, D/o. Late Gangadaran — 80/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040001802024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
178/2024
Filing Date
28-03-2024
Registration No
80/2024
Registration Date
02-04-2024
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V. Anbalangan
Adv. Tr. G. Ashok, M.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Mahalakshmi, D/o. Late Gangadaran
Yuvalakshmi, D/o. Late Gangadharan
Dellibabu, S/o. Late Gangadaran
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 80/2024 On 31-07-2025, the court completed examination of petitioner V. Anbalangan's testimony regarding a loan dispute with the late Gangadaran. The court proceeded with cross-examination of respondents (Gangadaran's daughters and son), who challenged the petitioner's credibility regarding the loan amount, documentary evidence, and authenticity of the promissory note allegedly signed by the deceased. The court found no contradictory evidence and concluded there was no basis to reject the petitioner's claims. The final order determination was marked as "Nil" regarding counter-arguments from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 80/2024 On 31-07-2025, the court completed examination of petitioner V. Anbalangan's testimony regarding a loan dispute with the late Gangadaran. The court proceeded with cross-examination of respondents (Gangadaran's daughters and son), who challenged the petitioner's credibility regarding the loan amount, documentary evidence, and authenticity of the promissory note allegedly signed by the deceased. The court found no contradictory evidence and concluded there was no basis to reject the petitioner's claims. The final order determination was marked as "Nil" regarding counter-arguments from respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts