Jayalakshmi vs Siva, S/o. Banugopan — 42/2025

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040001442025

Filing Number

144/2025

Filing Date

28-Feb-2025

Registration No

42/2025

Registration Date

04-Mar-2025

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayalakshmi

    Adv. Tr.G.Ashok M.A. B.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Siva, S/o. Banugopan

  2. 2.Papitha, W/o. Siva

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary In O.S. No. 42/2025 dated 04-02-2026, the court examined the plaintiff's witness (PW1) regarding a money dispute involving promissory notes. The defendants denied borrowing ₹1,00,000 and disputed the plaintiff's claims regarding repayment amounts and interest calculations. The court rejected the plaintiff's testimony and oral evidence as unreliable, finding contradictions in the plaintiff's account and insufficient credible proof of the alleged debt transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  14. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  16. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  17. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  18. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  20. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  21. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  22. 16-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  23. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  24. 19-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  25. 29-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  26. 25-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  27. 20-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  28. 04-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  29. 30-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  30. 23-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  31. 19-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  32. 04-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

  33. 04-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 28-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In O.S. No. 42/2025 dated 04-02-2026, the court examined the plaintiff's witness (PW1) regarding a money dispute involving promissory notes. The defendants denied borrowing ₹1,00,000 and disputed the plaintiff's claims regarding repayment amounts and interest calculations. The court rejected the plaintiff's testimony and oral evidence as unreliable, finding contradictions in the plaintiff's account and insufficient credible proof of the alleged debt transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case