Vinnarasi vs Sulochana, w/o. Nagaraj Advocate - Tr.P.Pandian — 76/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 27(c), 40, 27(c), 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM040001342024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
134/2024
Filing Date
07-03-2024
Registration No
76/2024
Registration Date
27-03-2024
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinnarasi
Adv. Thiru. P. Arunkumar
Respondent(s)
Sulochana, w/o. Nagaraj Advocate - Tr.P.Pandian
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 30-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 08-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is O.S. No. 76/2024 between Vinnarasi (petitioner) and Sulochana (respondent). The document contains cross-examination testimony from PW2 (Senthilkumar) dated 27-10-2025 regarding a property dispute. The witness testified about land ownership, lease arrangements, and agricultural details of a disputed property measuring 1 acre 30 cents, but denied knowledge of certain transactions and the respondent's involvement. The court record shows the witness's deposition was recorded, but no final order/judgment is visible in this extract—the document appears incomplete, ending with procedural notes and the judge's signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is O.S. No. 76/2024 between Vinnarasi (petitioner) and Sulochana (respondent). The document contains cross-examination testimony from PW2 (Senthilkumar) dated 27-10-2025 regarding a property dispute. The witness testified about land ownership, lease arrangements, and agricultural details of a disputed property measuring 1 acre 30 cents, but denied knowledge of certain transactions and the respondent's involvement. The court record shows the witness's deposition was recorded, but no final order/judgment is visible in this extract—the document appears incomplete, ending with procedural notes and the judge's signature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts