Chinnasamy vs Jayakumar, S/o. Late Somasundaram — 31/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNTM040001102023
Filing Number
108/2023
Filing Date
27-01-2023
Registration No
31/2023
Registration Date
20-04-2023
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chinnasamy
Adv. Tr. G. Dineshkumar
Respondent(s)
Jayakumar, S/o. Late Somasundaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Chinnasamy v. Jayakumar (A.S. No. 31/2023) The appellate court dismissed Chinnasamy's partition suit, upholding the trial court's dismissal. The court found the suit was fundamentally defective due to non-joinder of necessary parties—specifically, Somasundaram's legal heirs (wife, daughters Kala and Shanthi) and Kotieswaran's heirs were not impleaded, rendering any partition decree incomplete and unenforceable against absent parties entitled to shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Chinnasamy v. Jayakumar (A.S. No. 31/2023) The appellate court dismissed Chinnasamy's partition suit, upholding the trial court's dismissal. The court found the suit was fundamentally defective due to non-joinder of necessary parties—specifically, Somasundaram's legal heirs (wife, daughters Kala and Shanthi) and Kotieswaran's heirs were not impleaded, rendering any partition decree incomplete and unenforceable against absent parties entitled to shares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts