Kamatchi vs Umamageswari — 64/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2), 25(b), 25(d), 25(d). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM040000892023

Judgement

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

87/2023

Filing Date

23-01-2023

Registration No

64/2023

Registration Date

02-03-2023

Court

Sub Court, Cheyyar

Judge

2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

Acts & Sections

COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 37(2), 25(b), 25(d), 25(d)

Petitioner(s)

Kamatchi

Adv. Tr.J. Ramakrishnan

Venkatesan

Respondent(s)

Umamageswari

A.Karunakaran

A.Dhasarathan

A.Kumar

A.Perumal

K.Devi

Krishnan

Vijaya lakshmi

R.Kanaga

Govinda samy

Arumugam

Settu achari

Suresh

V.Kannan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar

29-04-2026

Judgement

24-04-2026

Arguments

15-04-2026

Arguments

02-04-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

10-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary Case Number: O.S. No. 64/2023 | Date: 10-02-2026 This is a property dispute case involving inheritance and land partition among multiple defendants. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the second plaintiff (Defendant 2), who testified regarding ancestral property measuring 3 acres 95 cents that was partitioned among heirs, with various sub-divisions and subsequent sales to other defendants. The case involves competing claims over land allotments, boundary disputes, and allegations of encroachment on allocated portions of the property. Outcome: The case remains pending with no final judgment issued; the cross-examination testimony was recorded and the matter appears to be still under adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case Number: O.S. No. 64/2023 | Date: 10-02-2026 This is a property dispute case involving inheritance and land partition among multiple defendants. The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the second plaintiff (Defendant 2), who testified regarding ancestral property measuring 3 acres 95 cents that was partitioned among heirs, with various sub-divisions and subsequent sales to other defendants. The case involves competing claims over land allotments, boundary disputes, and allegations of encroachment on allocated portions of the property. Outcome: The case remains pending with no final judgment issued; the cross-examination testimony was recorded and the matter appears to be still under adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cheyyar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case