Annamary vs Rajeshkumar — 29/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section SECTION166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTM040000792024
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2024
Filing Number
79/2024
Filing Date
16-02-2024
Registration No
29/2024
Registration Date
16-02-2024
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annamary
Adv. Rajesh P
Lourdumary
Adv. Rajesh P
Pannerselvam
Adv. Rajesh P
Sundari
Adv. Rajesh P
Natchatiram
Adv. Rajesh P
Jothi
Adv. Rajesh P
Respondent(s)
Rajeshkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate JudgeCheyyar
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 24-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In M.C.O.P. No. 29/2024 before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar, witness testimony was recorded on 4 February 2026 regarding a road accident case. The witness admitted during cross-examination that he did not directly witness the incident but provided sympathetic testimony in favor of the deceased (his village acquaintance) despite not filing any police complaint, and the court acknowledged this testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In M.C.O.P. No. 29/2024 before the Principal Subordinate Judge at Cheyyar, witness testimony was recorded on 4 February 2026 regarding a road accident case. The witness admitted during cross-examination that he did not directly witness the incident but provided sympathetic testimony in favor of the deceased (his village acquaintance) despite not filing any police complaint, and the court acknowledged this testimony as recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts