Vagithamani vs Sekar — 33/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTM040000512022
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
51/2022
Filing Date
28-01-2022
Registration No
33/2022
Registration Date
31-03-2022
Court
Sub Court, Cheyyar
Judge
2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vagithamani
Adv. Tr.K. Vivekanandan, Tmt. B. Jothi Vivekanandan
Jeevitha (Minor)
Hemanth (Minor)
Pavun
Chandiran
Respondent(s)
Sekar
The Manager, The New India Assurance Company Ltd.,
Dinesh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Sub JudgeCheyyar
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 18-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the petitioner's contentions regarding vehicle seizure and ownership claims in case No. 33/2022. The court found that only two persons (the vehicle owner and operator) had authority over the vehicle under IPC Section 73 P 6645, and rejected arguments that three persons were involved in the alleged offense. The court upheld the seizure proceedings and dismissed the petition with direction to proceed against the second respondent as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petitioner's contentions regarding vehicle seizure and ownership claims in case No. 33/2022. The court found that only two persons (the vehicle owner and operator) had authority over the vehicle under IPC Section 73 P 6645, and rejected arguments that three persons were involved in the alleged offense. The court upheld the seizure proceedings and dismissed the petition with direction to proceed against the second respondent as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts