C.Jayamani vs K.Duraisami — 246/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 42(a). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM030005912022

Case disposed

Filing Number

678/2022

Filing Date

09-09-2022

Registration No

246/2022

Registration Date

15-09-2022

Court

Sub Court, Arani

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge,Arni

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 42(a)

Petitioner(s)

C.Jayamani

Adv. K.Rajamoorthy. B.A.,B.L.,

Respondent(s)

K.Duraisami

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Arni

27-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Judgement

24-03-2026

Judgement

13-03-2026

Judgement

11-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Copy of Order/Judgment

Case Summary: C. Jayamani v. K. Duraisami (O.S. No. 246/2022) The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a sale agreement. The plaintiff sought to compel the defendant to execute a deed of sale for a property agreed to be sold for ₹3,00,000 (with ₹2,50,000 paid upfront in 2017 and ₹50,000 due within two years). The court found the plaintiff failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligation within the stipulated timeframe—he only initiated action in August 2022, nearly three years after the deadline of September 2019, thereby losing his entitlement to specific performance relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C. Jayamani v. K. Duraisami (O.S. No. 246/2022) The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a sale agreement. The plaintiff sought to compel the defendant to execute a deed of sale for a property agreed to be sold for ₹3,00,000 (with ₹2,50,000 paid upfront in 2017 and ₹50,000 due within two years). The court found the plaintiff failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform his contractual obligation within the stipulated timeframe—he only initiated action in August 2022, nearly three years after the deadline of September 2019, thereby losing his entitlement to specific performance relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Arani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case