R.Sivagami vs R.Kannan (died) — 100066/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 33(1). Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM030002832015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
22-04-2015
Registration No
100066/2015
Registration Date
30-04-2015
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.Sivagami
Adv. G.Ravi Vellore, S.Shyam Sundar Arni.
Respondent(s)
R.Kannan (died)
K. Pachaiyammal
K. Pattu
K. Velu
K. Unnamalai
K. Vasantha
P. Venda
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Disposed
Judgement
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Court of Arani, Tiruvannamalai District, dismissed the defendants' counterclaims and awarded the plaintiff R. Sivakambi ₹2,28,000 (principal loan amount plus interest) with 6% interest on the principal amount of ₹60,000 from the date of filing until recovery, plus court costs, payable within three months from the judgment date. The court found that the mortgage deed executed on 07.08.2003 was valid and binding, establishing the debt obligation despite defendants' allegations of coercion or fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Subordinate Court of Arani, Tiruvannamalai District, dismissed the defendants' counterclaims and awarded the plaintiff R. Sivakambi ₹2,28,000 (principal loan amount plus interest) with 6% interest on the principal amount of ₹60,000 from the date of filing until recovery, plus court costs, payable within three months from the judgment date. The court found that the mortgage deed executed on 07.08.2003 was valid and binding, establishing the debt obligation despite defendants' allegations of coercion or fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts