S.V.Kumar vs Kanagarani — 123/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1S26. Disposed: Uncontested--Partially Allowed on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM030002762025
Filing Number
307/2025
Filing Date
25-Jul-2025
Registration No
123/2025
Registration Date
01-Aug-2025
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Partially Allowed
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.V.Kumar
Adv. R.Manogaran
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kanagarani
-
2.Venkatesan
-
3.Suguna
-
4.Thenmozhi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of Order/JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 123/2025 The court rejected the petitioner S.V. Kumar's claim for specific performance of a sale agreement, finding he failed to pay the outstanding amount (₹25,000) within the contractual three-year period and provided no adequate explanation for the 20-month delay in initiating legal action. However, the court awarded the petitioner alternative relief: the respondents must repay the advance of ₹1,00,000 with 12% interest from the agreement date (13.02.2020) until filing, plus court costs and interest at prescribed rates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
26-Mar-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
27-Feb-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
09-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
09-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
20-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
15-Oct-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
12-Sep-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
01-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 123/2025
Summary of Case 123/2025 The court rejected the petitioner S.V. Kumar's claim for specific performance of a sale agreement, finding he failed to pay the outstanding amount (₹25,000) within the contractual three-year period and provided no adequate explanation for the 20-month delay in initiating legal action. However, the court awarded the petitioner alternative relief: the respondents must repay the advance of ₹1,00,000 with 12% interest from the agreement date (13.02.2020) until filing, plus court costs and interest at prescribed rates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts