LAKSHMANAKANTHAN @ SOMASUNDARAM vs PITCHAI — 112/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,Rl.1,Sec.26. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM030002612023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
313/2023
Filing Date
05-07-2023
Registration No
112/2023
Registration Date
14-07-2023
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAKSHMANAKANTHAN @ SOMASUNDARAM
Adv. THIUR. V. VENKATESAN
Respondent(s)
PITCHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court's decision declares that the plaintiff is the absolute title holder of the first schedule property based on a will dated 12.10.1994 executed by Chinna Kuzlandai Pillai in the plaintiff's favor. The court also grants a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the property. The court rejected the defendant's counterclaim that the property was transferred to the defendant's mother through a settlement deed dated 04.05.2012, finding insufficient evidence of valid transfer of rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court's decision declares that the plaintiff is the absolute title holder of the first schedule property based on a will dated 12.10.1994 executed by Chinna Kuzlandai Pillai in the plaintiff's favor. The court also grants a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the property. The court rejected the defendant's counterclaim that the property was transferred to the defendant's mother through a settlement deed dated 04.05.2012, finding insufficient evidence of valid transfer of rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts