Canara Bank Formerly Syndicate Bank Arni Branch Rep By Its Manager vs Kokila — 199/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM030002582025

e-Filing Number

15-07-2025

Filing Number

285/2025

Filing Date

17-Jul-2025

Registration No

199/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

Sub Court, Arani

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge,Arni

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1
Limitation Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Canara Bank Formerly Syndicate Bank Arni Branch Rep By Its Manager

    Adv. Aristatil G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kokila

  2. 2.Submranani

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge,Arni

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge,Arni

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge,Arni

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is an Original Suit (OS 199/2025) filed in Tamil Nadu regarding a property dispute under S.R. 1 with reference to survey No. 10-1873. The petitioner claims employment-related grievances and disputes the authenticity of documents submitted by the respondent. The court has admitted the petition after careful consideration and has directed that all relevant documents (marked as Exhibits M/1 through M/8, including educational certificates, agreements, and salary records) be examined on their merits for final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge,Arni

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge,Arni

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 199/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This is an Original Suit (OS 199/2025) filed in Tamil Nadu regarding a property dispute under S.R. 1 with reference to survey No. 10-1873. The petitioner claims employment-related grievances and disputes the authenticity of documents submitted by the respondent. The court has admitted the petition after careful consideration and has directed that all relevant documents (marked as Exhibits M/1 through M/8, including educational certificates, agreements, and salary records) be examined on their merits for final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case