M.Sankar vs K.Arumugam — 88/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM030002122022
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
270/2022
Filing Date
19-04-2022
Registration No
88/2022
Registration Date
19-04-2022
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Sankar
Adv. Thiru. S.Elumalai. B.A.,B.L.,(Arni)
Respondent(s)
K.Arumugam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-03-2026 | Part Heard |
| 19-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Part Heard |
| 02-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS 88/2022 (dated 10.02.2026), the court examined disputes regarding document authenticity, signatures, and property transactions involving a check numbered 92AB860014 dated 25.03.2019. The court found inconsistencies in the documentary evidence, signature authenticity, and the chain of possession of the check, and dismissed the petitioner's claims regarding forgery and unauthorized transactions. The court upheld that the defendant's versions regarding the document's validity and the rightful transfer of the check were supported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS 88/2022 (dated 10.02.2026), the court examined disputes regarding document authenticity, signatures, and property transactions involving a check numbered 92AB860014 dated 25.03.2019. The court found inconsistencies in the documentary evidence, signature authenticity, and the chain of possession of the check, and dismissed the petitioner's claims regarding forgery and unauthorized transactions. The court upheld that the defendant's versions regarding the document's validity and the rightful transfer of the check were supported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts