Arulmighu sundara vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur (rep by) P.Palani and 4 Others vs The commissioner H.R.C Chennai and 3 Others — 135/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 70,22. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM030002092021
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
255/2021
Filing Date
16-03-2021
Registration No
135/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arulmighu sundara vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur (rep by) P.Palani and 4 Others
Adv. K.Narayanan. B.A.,LLB.,
Arulmighu sundara vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur (rep by)A.Mani
Arulmighu sundara vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur (rep by) M.Namachivayam
Arulmighu sundara vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur (rep by) N.Rajendiran
Arulmighu sundara vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur (rep by)D.Vijalakshmi
Respondent(s)
The commissioner H.R.C Chennai and 3 Others
The Joint Commissioner Tiruvannamalai
Assistant commissioner Tiruvannamalai
The Inspector/Fit person Arni
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 21-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary of OS 135/2021 Case: Arulmighu Sundara Vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur v. The Commissioner H.R.C Chennai and Others Date: 13.03.2026 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's (temple's) claims regarding administrative management and financial accountability. The court found that the temple lacks proper documentation for maintenance work claimed to have been undertaken, cannot establish standing to challenge certain administrative decisions, and failed to provide substantive evidence supporting its contentions regarding fund disbursement and temple governance. The court upheld the Commissioner's authority and dismissed all grievances raised by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of OS 135/2021 Case: Arulmighu Sundara Vinayagar Temple, Kunnathur v. The Commissioner H.R.C Chennai and Others Date: 13.03.2026 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's (temple's) claims regarding administrative management and financial accountability. The court found that the temple lacks proper documentation for maintenance work claimed to have been undertaken, cannot establish standing to challenge certain administrative decisions, and failed to provide substantive evidence supporting its contentions regarding fund disbursement and temple governance. The court upheld the Commissioner's authority and dismissed all grievances raised by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts