Venkatesan vs Sumathi — 33/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 13(i)(ii). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
HMOP - Hindu Marriage Original Peitition
CNR: TNTM030001632019
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
185/2019
Filing Date
08-03-2019
Registration No
33/2019
Registration Date
25-04-2019
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatesan
Adv. Chandrasekaran, Shanmugam
Respondent(s)
Sumathi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 24-02-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 12-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil-language court order dated 02.04.2024 in a matrimonial case (Case No. 33/2019). The petitioner (married since 26.08.1979, now 44 years old) claims to have raised a child from a relationship with another woman, and has been living separately for 2.3 years while supporting the child alone without receiving any maintenance or support from the spouse. The petitioner alleges the spouse has been unfaithful and contests the spouse's suitability as a parent, stating the child has been kept from meeting the spouse. The petitioner filed a false case against the spouse out of anger over the affair and seeks custody/guardianship of the child, asserting the spouse is preparing to start a new family. The petition appears to be dismissed as the court found the petitioner's allegations and grounds to be false or unsubstantiated based on the language "rhpay;y" (not correct/not valid) used repeatedly in rejecting the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil-language court order dated 02.04.2024 in a matrimonial case (Case No. 33/2019). The petitioner (married since 26.08.1979, now 44 years old) claims to have raised a child from a relationship with another woman, and has been living separately for 2.3 years while supporting the child alone without receiving any maintenance or support from the spouse. The petitioner alleges the spouse has been unfaithful and contests the spouse's suitability as a parent, stating the child has been kept from meeting the spouse. The petitioner filed a false case against the spouse out of anger over the affair and seeks custody/guardianship of the child, asserting the spouse is preparing to start a new family. The petition appears to be dismissed as the court found the petitioner's allegations and grounds to be false or unsubstantiated based on the language "rhpay;y" (not correct/not valid) used repeatedly in rejecting the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts