Canara Bank, Arani Branch rep by Chief Manager vs S. Keerthika — 65/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1,2. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM030001592025
e-Filing Number
25-04-2025
Filing Number
178/2025
Filing Date
02-Jun-2025
Registration No
65/2025
Registration Date
19-Jun-2025
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Canara Bank, Arani Branch rep by Chief Manager
Adv. Aristatil G
Respondent(s)
-
1.S. Keerthika
-
2.R. Settu
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
30-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary In Case No. OS. 65/2025, the court heard a petition filed by a 33-year-old plaintiff regarding disputed property matters. The court accepted the plaintiff's affidavit and documentary evidence (marked as Exhibits M/1 through M/9), including educational certificates, agreements, and property-related documents dated from 2013 to 2022. The court directed the parties to resolve the dispute as stated in the petition and adjourned the matter for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
05-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
07-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
20-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
05-Nov-2025
Batta
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
10-Sep-2025
Batta
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
29-Jul-2025
Batta
Subordinate Judge,Arni
-
19-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2025
Summary In Case No. OS. 65/2025, the court heard a petition filed by a 33-year-old plaintiff regarding disputed property matters. The court accepted the plaintiff's affidavit and documentary evidence (marked as Exhibits M/1 through M/9), including educational certificates, agreements, and property-related documents dated from 2013 to 2022. The court directed the parties to resolve the dispute as stated in the petition and adjourned the matter for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts