S. THANIKASALAM vs NADHIYA AND 3 OTHERS — 40/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 22. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM030000612024
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
66/2024
Filing Date
05-02-2024
Registration No
40/2024
Registration Date
05-02-2024
Court
Sub Court, Arani
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. THANIKASALAM
Adv. P. VASUDEVAN. B.A.,B.L.,
Respondent(s)
NADHIYA AND 3 OTHERS
Minor Harish
Minor Monisha
Sridhar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge,Arni
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 21-01-2026 | Trial | |
| 18-12-2025 | Trial | |
| 13-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking pre-judgment attachment of property and an order directing defendants to furnish security for a debt of ₹4,00,000. The court found the allegations were vague and lacked specific evidence that defendants were disposing of the property, holding that attachment before judgment is an extraordinary remedy requiring concrete proof of imminent asset dissipation, not mere bald assertions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's application seeking pre-judgment attachment of property and an order directing defendants to furnish security for a debt of ₹4,00,000. The court found the allegations were vague and lacked specific evidence that defendants were disposing of the property, holding that attachment before judgment is an extraordinary remedy requiring concrete proof of imminent asset dissipation, not mere bald assertions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts