GODHAVARI vs VANAJA AND 15 OHTERS — 291/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.37(2), 27(C), O7,R1,2. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM010069612022
Filing Number
2265/2022
Filing Date
19-Dec-2022
Registration No
291/2022
Registration Date
20-Dec-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GODHAVARI
Adv. THIRU.P. ARUNMOGAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.VANAJA AND 15 OHTERS
-
2.DHAYANIDHI
-
3.SASIKALA
-
4.SUBHA
-
5.SURIYA
-
6.DURGA BHAI
-
7.BABU
-
8.KAVERI
-
9.NALINA
-
10.PRABHU
-
11.BHARATHI
-
12.THE ASSOCIATE REGISTRAR OFFICER
-
13.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR ADMINISTRATION
-
14.THE DISTRICT GOVERNOR
-
15.THE COMMISSIONER
-
16.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary In this civil suit (O.S. No. 291/2022) before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, the court ruled on a property dispute involving sections 12-16 of a property deed. The court found that sections 12-16 are unrelated to the plaintiff's claim and dismissed the objections raised against these sections, holding that they are governed by state rules and judicial precedent. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments against sections 12-16 as not sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Enquiry
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Enquiry
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Enquiry
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Appearance
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Fair OrderView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Trial
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Trial
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Trial
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Apr-2024
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Nov-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Sep-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Jul-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
26-Jun-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2023
Issues
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 291/2022
Summary In this civil suit (O.S. No. 291/2022) before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, the court ruled on a property dispute involving sections 12-16 of a property deed. The court found that sections 12-16 are unrelated to the plaintiff's claim and dismissed the objections raised against these sections, holding that they are governed by state rules and judicial precedent. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments against sections 12-16 as not sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts