GODHAVARI vs VANAJA AND 15 OHTERS — 291/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/s.37(2), 27(C), O7,R1,2,. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM010069612022
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2265/2022
Filing Date
19-12-2022
Registration No
291/2022
Registration Date
20-12-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GODHAVARI
Adv. THIRU.P. ARUNMOGAN
Respondent(s)
VANAJA AND 15 OHTERS
DHAYANIDHI
SASIKALA
SUBHA
SURIYA
DURGA BHAI
BABU
KAVERI
NALINA
PRABHU
BHARATHI
THE ASSOCIATE REGISTRAR OFFICER
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR ADMINISTRATION
THE DISTRICT GOVERNOR
THE COMMISSIONER
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 18-02-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 28-01-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 10-12-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Summary In this civil suit (O.S. No. 291/2022) before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, the court ruled on a property dispute involving sections 12-16 of a property deed. The court found that sections 12-16 are unrelated to the plaintiff's claim and dismissed the objections raised against these sections, holding that they are governed by state rules and judicial precedent. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments against sections 12-16 as not sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this civil suit (O.S. No. 291/2022) before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, the court ruled on a property dispute involving sections 12-16 of a property deed. The court found that sections 12-16 are unrelated to the plaintiff's claim and dismissed the objections raised against these sections, holding that they are governed by state rules and judicial precedent. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments against sections 12-16 as not sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts