VASANTHA ALIAS AYISHA vs P. ABHISHEIK — 236/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Sec26,Or7,Ru1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM010051062023
Filing Number
1568/2023
Filing Date
09-Oct-2023
Registration No
236/2023
Registration Date
19-Oct-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
12-Additional District Judge
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VASANTHA ALIAS AYISHA
Adv. THIRU.V. THIYAGARAJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.P. ABHISHEIK
-
2.B. PURUSHOTHAMAN
-
3.THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUVANNAMALAI TALUK, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
-
4.THE JOINT SUB REGISTRAR II
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary: In OS No.236/2023 before the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai (dated 02.01.2026), the court conducted cross-examination of defendants 3 and 4 based on affidavit evidence. The court found that defendants 3 and 4 are not necessary parties to the suit and directed that they be impleaded or the case against them be dismissed, as they lack proper standing in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Additional District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Additional District Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Additional District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Additional District Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Additional District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Additional District Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Issues
Additional District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Issues
Additional District Judge
-
08-Apr-2025
Issues
Additional District Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Issues
Additional District Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Issues
Additional District Judge
-
18-Feb-2025
Issues
Additional District Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
06-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
15-Jul-2024
Written Statement
-
13-Jun-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
03-Apr-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
05-Mar-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
19-Feb-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
07-Feb-2024
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
02-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
01-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
19-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 236/2023
Summary: In OS No.236/2023 before the Additional District Judge, Tiruvannamalai (dated 02.01.2026), the court conducted cross-examination of defendants 3 and 4 based on affidavit evidence. The court found that defendants 3 and 4 are not necessary parties to the suit and directed that they be impleaded or the case against them be dismissed, as they lack proper standing in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts