V.T.RAMAN vs ABISHEK — 213/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1ANDO34,R4. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 07th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTM010049322023

Case disposed

Filing Number

1546/2023

Filing Date

26-09-2023

Registration No

213/2023

Registration Date

26-09-2023

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed without cost

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1ANDO34,R4
Court Fees Act, 1870 Section U/S. 33(4), 27(C)
Ia/1/2023 Classification : 151 Petition Section V.T.RAMANABISHEK
Ia/3/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section V.T.RAMANABISHEK
Ia/4/2024 Classification : Advance Petition Section V.T.RAMANABISHEK

Petitioner(s)

V.T.RAMAN

Adv. THIRU.K. DHARANI

Respondent(s)

ABISHEK

THE JOINT II SUB-REGISTRAR, TIRUVANNAMALAI.

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TIRUVANNAMALAI.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUVANNAMALAI.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Judgement

27-03-2026

Stay

18-03-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Decree

Case Summary: V.T. Raman v. Abishek (O.S. No. 213/2023) The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for cancellation of a mortgage deed dated 21.10.2021. The mortgage deed (Document No. 11572 of 2021) was foreclosed and cancelled, with the first defendant permitted to withdraw amounts previously deposited by the plaintiff in court. The Sub-Registrar was directed to make necessary entries regarding the deed's cancellation, and both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: V.T. Raman v. Abishek (O.S. No. 213/2023) The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for cancellation of a mortgage deed dated 21.10.2021. The mortgage deed (Document No. 11572 of 2021) was foreclosed and cancelled, with the first defendant permitted to withdraw amounts previously deposited by the plaintiff in court. The Sub-Registrar was directed to make necessary entries regarding the deed's cancellation, and both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case