Gopal vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARNI TALUK POLICE STATION — 3389/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTM010044442025
e-Filing Number
17-10-2025
Filing Number
3521/2025
Filing Date
24-10-2025
Registration No
3389/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
966
Police Station
Arni Taluk Police Station
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gopal
Adv. GANESAN R.
Araiyalamdoss Alais Anthonidoss
Adv. GANESAN R.
Murugan
Adv. GANESAN R.
Vetri
Adv. GANESAN R.
Oosivenkatesan
Adv. GANESAN R.
Sabapathi
Adv. GANESAN R.
ANBU
Adv. GANESAN R.
Pitchai
Adv. GANESAN R.
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARNI TALUK POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 25-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 02-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai allowed the transfer petition and ordered that case S.C.No.27/2019 pending before the Assistant Sessions Court, Arni be transferred to the Additional District and Sessions Court, Arni. The court found that both cases arose from the same occurrence, constitute counter-cases with overlapping witnesses and allegations, and therefore must be tried jointly by one court to ensure fair trial, identify the true aggressor, and avoid conflicting decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai allowed the transfer petition and ordered that case S.C.No.27/2019 pending before the Assistant Sessions Court, Arni be transferred to the Additional District and Sessions Court, Arni. The court found that both cases arose from the same occurrence, constitute counter-cases with overlapping witnesses and allegations, and therefore must be tried jointly by one court to ensure fair trial, identify the true aggressor, and avoid conflicting decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts