SUDHA AND 6 OTHERS vs MANIRATHINAM — 598/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTM010038882022
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1063/2022
Filing Date
06-09-2022
Registration No
598/2022
Registration Date
12-09-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUDHA AND 6 OTHERS
Adv. THIRU.K.VIJAYAKUMAR
MINOR NAVEEN, REP. BY HIS NEXT FRIEND /GUARDIAN MOTHER SUDHA.
MINOR VISHNU, REP. BY HIS NEXT FRIEND /GUARDIAN MOTHER SUDHA.
SAGUNTHALA
RAMASAMY
MALA
USHA
Respondent(s)
MANIRATHINAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 27-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) in MCOP No. 598 of 2022 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai. A Senior Resident from the Department of Nephrology testified on 24.07.2025 regarding a two-wheeler accident on 07.11.2018 involving a 40-year-old male patient who had alcohol intake, was drowsy with reactive pupils, and had stable vitals. The witness noted that medico-legal procedures including alcohol intake documentation were recorded, and that there was a 26-hour gap between the medical examination and the post-mortem examination conducted on 08.11.2018 at 3:15 AM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (not a final court order) in MCOP No. 598 of 2022 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai. A Senior Resident from the Department of Nephrology testified on 24.07.2025 regarding a two-wheeler accident on 07.11.2018 involving a 40-year-old male patient who had alcohol intake, was drowsy with reactive pupils, and had stable vitals. The witness noted that medico-legal procedures including alcohol intake documentation were recorded, and that there was a 26-hour gap between the medical examination and the post-mortem examination conducted on 08.11.2018 at 3:15 AM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts