K S Subha vs R Madhankumar — 12/2025
Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
CRLA - Criminal Appeal
CNR: TNTM010036512024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-09-2024
Filing Number
2889/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
12-02-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K S Subha
Adv. abiraman s
Respondent(s)
R Madhankumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 27-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 29-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 20-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai allowed the petition filed by K.S. Subha under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the 18-day delay in preferring a criminal appeal against a Domestic Violence Act judgment dated 03.07.2024. The court found the delay was neither willful nor wanton, and in the interest of justice, permitted the appellant to contest her case on merits regarding the maintenance amount of Rs. 25,000/month awarded by the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai allowed the petition filed by K.S. Subha under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the 18-day delay in preferring a criminal appeal against a Domestic Violence Act judgment dated 03.07.2024. The court found the delay was neither willful nor wanton, and in the interest of justice, permitted the appellant to contest her case on merits regarding the maintenance amount of Rs. 25,000/month awarded by the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts