DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER THIRUVANNAMALAI vs Muniyan — 145/2025

Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNTM010034552025

e-Filing Number

13-08-2025

Filing Number

771/2025

Filing Date

14-Aug-2025

Registration No

145/2025

Registration Date

19-Aug-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER THIRUVANNAMALAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muniyan

  2. 2.Vanaja

  3. 3.Bharathi

  4. 4.Panchatsaram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Fair OrderView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Decreetal OrderView PDF

    The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvannamalai filed a petition requesting action to provide compensation to landowners and payment of deposit amounts to the rightful owners. The court heard the petition on 25.03.2026 with only the Government Pleader present; respondents were absent. Finding nothing survived for adjudication, the court closed the petition with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  9. 19-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvannamalai filed a petition requesting action to provide compensation to landowners and payment of deposit amounts to the rightful owners. The court heard the petition on 25.03.2026 with only the Government Pleader present; respondents were absent. Finding nothing survived for adjudication, the court closed the petition with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case