Gayathri vs Manickaraj — 44/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTM010033162024

e-Filing Number

01-09-2024

Filing Number

2619/2024

Filing Date

05-Sep-2024

Registration No

44/2025

Registration Date

30-Jun-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai

Judge

12-Additional District Judge

Last updated 11-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 29
Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gayathri

    Adv. SUNDARESAN S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manickaraj

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  4. 12-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge

  7. 08-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge

  8. 12-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge

  9. 30-Jun-2025

    I.A OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by Gayathri under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 247-day delay in preferring a criminal appeal against the Additional Mahila Court's judgment (DVC.No.29/2021 dated 04.12.2023) has been allowed. The court found the delay was not willful or wanton, as the petitioner was unable to file the appeal in time due to mental distress caused by the respondent's non-compliance with court orders and failure to provide financial assistance. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 30-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 05-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Gayathri under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 247-day delay in preferring a criminal appeal against the Additional Mahila Court's judgment (DVC.No.29/2021 dated 04.12.2023) has been allowed. The court found the delay was not willful or wanton, as the petitioner was unable to file the appeal in time due to mental distress caused by the respondent's non-compliance with court orders and failure to provide financial assistance. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case