BAGGIALAKSHMI vs RAJKUMAR AND 3 OTHERS — 166/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/s. 25 (b), Sec26,151,Or7,Ru1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTM010033022022
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
841/2022
Filing Date
08-08-2022
Registration No
166/2022
Registration Date
10-08-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Tiruvannamalai
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BAGGIALAKSHMI
Adv. THIRU.M. SAMPATHRAJAN
Respondent(s)
RAJKUMAR AND 3 OTHERS
SWARNALAKSHMI
SEENIVASAN
SELVAKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 166/2022 DW2 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, dated 22.04.2026, the court examined a property dispute involving a will executed on 22.10.2007. The court found that the defendant (Neevakundar) had improperly executed a registered document transferring property to third parties without proper authority. The court held that only the defendant had the authority to execute such a document and declared the disputed registered document (Item No. 562/10 dated 03.01.2008) invalid, rejecting the defendant's claim and the third parties' interests in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 166/2022 DW2 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, dated 22.04.2026, the court examined a property dispute involving a will executed on 22.10.2007. The court found that the defendant (Neevakundar) had improperly executed a registered document transferring property to third parties without proper authority. The court held that only the defendant had the authority to execute such a document and declared the disputed registered document (Item No. 562/10 dated 03.01.2008) invalid, rejecting the defendant's claim and the third parties' interests in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts